Search for: "Child v. Social Security Administration" Results 21 - 40 of 547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2020, 11:04 am by Jessica C. Diamond
  Also during the marriage, the Wife was declared permanently disabled by the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) and did not work. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Shahram Miri
The claim was rejected by the Social Security Administration because Florida law stated that a child could inherit through intestate succession only if conceived during the decedent's lifetime. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:57 am by Grant
  Wife gave birth and applied for social security benefits for the child and listed deceased-husband as the father. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:00 am by Daniel J. Kollias
In 1999, the Social Security Administration found that the father was disabled and awarded benefits retroactive to March, 1996. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 4:17 am by <ADMINNICENAME>
These payments go directly from the Social Security Administration to the custodial parent for the benefit of the children. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 6:19 am
On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred in failing to reduce the amount of the arrearage by the amount of dependency benefits paid directly to the plaintiff, as custodian of and representative payee for the child, by the Social Security Administration, as additional support for the child in light of the awarding of Social Security disability benefits to the defendant. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:27 pm by Kristine Knaplund
  In an unanimous opinion by Justice Ginsburg, the Court sided squarely with the Social Security Administration, thus giving Chevron deference to a federal agency’s interpretation for the seventh time in the past five years. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:48 pm by Karen T. Willitts, Esq.
In 2002, also during the marriage, the Social Security Administration determined that the Defendant was disabled by multiple sclerosis. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:04 am
What is the 5 step process the Social Security Administration uses in determining eligibility for Social Security Disability Income Benefits (SSDI)? [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am by David Smith
LB Croydon v Shanahan [2010] EWCA Crim 98 Ms Shanahan was tried on three offences under section 111A(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 5:05 am by David Smith
LB Croydon v Shanahan [2010] EWCA Crim 98 Ms Shanahan was tried on three offences under section 111A(1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
The Social Security Administration has indicated that payment of taxes, administration costs of the trust, and attorney’s fees do not violate the sole benefit rule. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 12:55 am by Thalia Kruger
Another core change is found in Article 10, which prescribes that, if a voluntary return does not take place, the judicial or administrative authorities shall forthwith meet with the child and take measures to provide for his or her temporary custody or care. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am by NL
The only mechanisms for recovery are those set out in section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am by NL
The only mechanisms for recovery are those set out in section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]