Search for: "Childs v. State of California (1983)"
Results 41 - 60
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 3:24 pm
The Bird court forged a lot of new territory in the world of tort law, creating some tort-reform "poster child" cases such as Bigbee v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:36 am
This post examines an opinion from the California Court of Appeals – First District, Division 1. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Outbreaks of measles in California, New York and other states have taught that everyone needs to be vaccinated. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In 1983, the Supreme Court considered in Lehr v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:53 pm
County of Los Angeles, No. 05-56467 California's maintenance of the California's Child Abuse Central Index (CACI), which is a database of known or suspected child abusers, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because identified individuals are not given a fair opportunity to challenge the allegations against them. . [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 8:37 am
Greenblott (1983) 141 Cal.App.3d 1, 7.) [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 10:59 am
Even federal Courts recognize and enforce this legal principle, as found in Kuchenig v California Co., 410 F.2d 222 (5th Cir. 1969). [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
” In 1983 the ABA approved these new Model Rules and again urged state courts to adopt them. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:38 am
A jury found him guilty of attempted kidnapping and child molestation, and the court sentenced him to state prison for the term he was serving at the time of the filing of the present petition. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Davis, No. 06-666 In the context of states/subdivisions' exemption of interest on their own bonds from their state income taxes, which are imposed on bond interest from other states, the Court rules that Kentucky's version of such a differential tax scheme does not offend the Commerce Clause. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:17 pm
" Supreme Court of California, July 28, 2008 People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:58 pm
California Appellate Districts, October 20, 2008 Widders v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
V. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:28 am
" California Appellate Districts, January 17, 2008 "Amtower v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:05 pm
Now, the state reviews only cases before 1983. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Schales, No. 07-10288 A child pornography case is remanded to the district court with order to vacate either the conviction for receiving child pornography in violations of 18 U.S.C. section 2252(a)(2), or the conviction for possessing child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2252(a)(4)(B), due to violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause where: 1) possession of child pornography is a lesser included offense within receipt of child pornography;… [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 8:00 pm
California Appellate Districts, September 25, 2008 Hernandez v. [read post]
