Search for: "Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp."
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2012, 1:58 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., a case about the “outside salesmen” exemption to the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:44 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:32 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. | Cato Institute - JDSupra Cato Institute (amazingly) agrees with the Ninth Circuit that courts... [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:36 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., which you can find here. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:40 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
See, e.g., Christopher B. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:03 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. – eligibility of “outside salesmen” of pharmaceutical companies for overtime pay Tues., April 17: 11-5683 — Dorsey v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., that held a proposed class of pharmaceutical sales representatives to be exempt from overtime pay pursuant to the “outside sales exemption. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., a case which may lead the Court to... [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:27 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., a case which may lead the Court to revisit whether an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations merit deference. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:49 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp, in which the court will decide the scope of the “outside sales” exemption under the Fair Labor... [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:58 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., Dorsey v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:40 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:59 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., for example, rejected the argument that pharmaceutical sales representatives did not qualify for the Outside Sales exemption. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 8:59 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., for example, rejected the argument that pharmaceutical sales representatives did not qualify for the Outside Sales exemption. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:34 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp., where it held that GlaxoSmithKline's PSRs were properly classified as exempt. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
SmithKline Beecham Corp. in which the Court will consider whether the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “outside sales exemption” applies to pharmaceutical sales representatives. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 7:23 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., a significant case concerning pharmaceutical sales representatives. [read post]
