Search for: "Cisco Technology, Inc" Results 81 - 100 of 311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2009, 8:11 am
Adtran Inc., Audiocodes Ltd., Avaya Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., et al. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:09 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In the Order, ALJ Gildea granted a joint motion filed by Complainant MOSAID Technologies Inc. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:32 am by MaxVal
The top five assignees based on the number of invention filings in the last five years are Microsoft, Google, Cisco, IBM, and Ricoh. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:11 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
The Securities and Exchange Commission has issued insider trading charges against Andreas “Andy” Bechtolsheim, the founder and Chief Architect of Silicon Valley-based technology company Arista Networks, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 1:48 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is MOSAID Technologies Inc. and the Respondents are Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Consumer Products LLC, Cisco Systems International B.V., and Scientific Atlanta LLC. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Continental Circuits LLC (claim construction) Cisco Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
By licensing their inventions, companies can extract fees for use of their technology. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:12 am by Eric Schweibenz
In the Order, ALJ Gildea granted-in-part Respondents Cisco Systems, Inc., Cisco Consumer Products LLC, Cisco Systems International B.V., and Scientific Atlanta LLC’s (collectively, “Cisco”) motion to preclude Complainant MOSAID Technologies Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:06 am by Eric Schweibenz
(collectively, “Cisco”) sought an order precluding Complainant MOSAID Technologies Inc. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 2:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
More than 50 companies, including Facebook Inc and Cisco Systems, sent a letter to President Donald Trump and U.S. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:42 am by Alex Gasser
The investigation is based on a May 17, 2011 complaint filed by MOSAID Technologies Inc. of Ottawa, Canada, alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain equipment for communications networks that infringe U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
 In making its decision the CAFC reconsidered and overruled its 2007 decision which held that for a party to be liable for induced infringement, some other entity must be liable for direct infringement (BMC Resources, Inc v Paymentech (2007)).Google, Cisco and Oracle filed an amici curiae brief arguing that if the Supreme Court followed the CAFC's decision the effect would be to expand the liability for patent infringement for tech companies and"...exacerbate the growing… [read post]