Search for: "Citizens for Responsibility v. DOJ"
Results 1 - 20
of 300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2021, 7:02 am
The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) has asked the Department of Justice’s Inspector General to investigate whether four lawyers “committed perjury or other crimes” while defending DOJ in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Wash. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:20 pm
The Letter was in response to Sharp v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
Circuit will hear oral argument in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:23 am
DOJ withheld over 100 pages of responsive documents, invoking at least two FOIA exemptions. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 10:18 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:26 am
Finally, End Citizens United PAC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
DOJ, 34 F.4th 14 (D.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 11:14 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit resumes in-person hearings on December 1, 2021, one of its first three cases will be a FOIA case: Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 9:45 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit will hear oral argument in Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
DOJ, 34 F.4th 14 (D.C. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:30 am
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:33 am
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
It is extremely difficult to reconcile DOJ’s position in Williamson with its position in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 7:51 am
Citizens for Responsibility in Wash. v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 7:29 pm
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:37 am
Citizen. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 12:24 pm
” In reaching its decision, the court rejected the government’s argument that because OLC opinions may not resolve questions of agency policy, they were not “final” opinions for purposes of section 552(a)(2)(A).In our March roundup, we jumped the gun and omitted a meaningful decision that was issued on Sunday, March 31st, namely Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
[The National Association for Fixed Annuities, et al, v. [read post]
