Search for: "City of Douglas v. Douglas Canning Company" Results 81 - 100 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
The Privacy and Information Security Law Blog commentary can be read here. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
City of Memphis, No. 08-744T VII (Ed. - According to Public Citizen, the issues appear similar to Ricci, above)o o SCOTUS docket hereBaxter v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:48 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations Agree or Else: Delaware Adopts Revised Default Standards for Discovery - bit.ly/wBkfdy (Gibbons) An On-the-Record Colloquy about Predictive Coding With Judge Peck -  bit.ly/zcefhs (Bob Ambrogi) All You Need is Metadata - bit.ly/xouxBb (Josh Gilliland) Can You Be Jailed for Forgetting Your Decryption Password? [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
 The background to this action can be found here. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Bell and MelissaRobbins Contts for Real Party in Interest Quality Loan Service Corporation.Bryan Cave, Douglas E. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:10 pm by Trent Dykes
Beginning in late 2014, New York City’s pension funds submitted a proxy access proposal to 75 large companies, which were targeted based on purported concerns over the companies’ governance or other features. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am by Emma Snell
“We are going to keep moving heaven and earth so that we can meet them,” he said. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In 1972, the Court went further and found in Eisenstadt v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Abiodun, No. 06-5335 Defendants' sentences for fraud and various fraud-related offenses are affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded where: 1) the district court incorrectly calculated the number of victims affected by defendants' conduct; but 2) an individual who is reimbursed for his economic loss can qualify as a victim under the number-of-victims enhancement set forth in U.S.S.G. section 2B1.1(b)(2). [read post]