Search for: "City of Jackson v. Gray"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
On Thursday the Mississippi Supreme Court reversed and rendered a bench verdict for the plaintiffs in Gray v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
* See McKee v Jackson, 152 AD2d 54, holding that a probationer is entitled to a minimum period of time to demonstrate his or her ability to successfully perform the duties of the position, and Gray v Bronx Developmental Center, 65 NY2d 904, holding that a probationer may be dismissed without notice and hearing after completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to the expiration of his or her maximum period of probation. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:41 pm
We had 115 posts on the LexBlog Network on subjects that include the oil spill, Michael Jackson's revocable living trust and how to win an appeal. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Jackson, 152 AD2d 54]. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 5:49 am
This court addressed a similar situation in Gray v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
Doe v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 1:55 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:06 am
The rationale for this was noted in McKee v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
Jones County Includes the city of Gray. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
Gray Government & Administrative Law, Injury Law Mississippi Supreme Court Jackson Public Sch. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Daw, 201 F.3d 521, 525 (4th Cir. 2000) ("the real party in interest in an official-capacity suit is the entity"); Gray v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
“ Lozano v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
– Houston lawyer Kendall Gray of Andrews Kurth on his blog, The Appellate Record For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog Network. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:22 am
In City Council of Los Angeles v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
City of Milwaukee, 406 U.S. 91, 103 (1972). [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) GOOD magazine article on Erich Spangenberg: The ethics of patent trolling (The Prior Art) US Patents – Decisions CAFC to hear claim and continuation rule case en banc; litigation schedule set: Tafas v Doll (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Gray on Claims) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Properly construed claims failed to read on… [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
But in Yick Wo v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: SRJ v Persons Unknown 11 June 2014 (Sir David Eady) Stocker v Stocker, heard 16 June 2014 (HHJ Parkes QC) Tardios v Linton, heard 17 June 2014 (HHJ Parkes QC) PNM v Times Newspapers, heard 18 June 2014 (Master of the Rolls, Jackson and Vos LJJ). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
