Search for: "City of Rochester v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2010, 3:04 am
Lunchtime injuriesSmith v City of Rochester, 255 AD2d 863Donna Smith, a City of Rochester parking monitor, slipped on a wet floor and fell while leaving a restaurant during an unpaid lunch break. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., SMITH, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 994 TP 22-01050 THE MATTER OF KELLY PHILLIPS, PETITIONER, vNEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., SMITH, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 994 TP 22-01050 THE MATTER OF KELLY PHILLIPS, PETITIONER, vNEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 5:14 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Smith v Northamptonshire County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 181 (11 March 2008) XZ (Russia) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 180 (11 March 2008) Smith v Northamptonshire County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 181 (11 March 2008) McKenny & Anor v Foster (t/a Foster Partnership) [2008] EWCA Civ 173 (06 March 2008) High Court (Family Division) PD v MD [2008] EWHC 403… [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:57 pm by Donald Thompson
Prior to trial the contact I had made at the company, Ric Smith, informed me that Shotspotter did not own the technology or maintain the reports for Rochester and could not lay a foundation for the admissibility of the recordings and reports at trial – the City of Rochester owned it and had the records. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Tenured teachers and school administrators facing disciplinary action typically have the right to elect the Education Law §3020-a.disciplinary procedure in lieu of a contract disciplinary procedureKilduff v Rochester City Sch. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The effect, if any, to be given to an earlier arbitration award in subsequent arbitration proceedings is a matter for determination in that forum" (Matter of City School Dist. of City of Tonawanda v Tonawanda Educ. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The effect, if any, to be given to an earlier arbitration award in subsequent arbitration proceedings is a matter for determination in that forum" (Matter of City School Dist. of City of Tonawanda v Tonawanda Educ. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:36 am
Smith v City of Rochester, 255 AD2d 863, however, sets out one significant exception to the general rule that eating lunch is not work. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
[Federalist Society SCOTUS Brief video with Jay Schweikert on Ramos v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and ROSENBLATT concur. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:19 am by Stephen Bilkis
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SMITH, LEVINE, CIPARICK and ROSENBLATT concur. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Top-Free Rights for Women in New York: People v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Against Church of the Good Shepherd, Town and Country, Missouri (MO) (plaintiffs were Bishop Wayne Smith of the Diocese of Missouri and ECUSA [joined as a necessary party, due to its claimed interest under the Dennis Canon]; trial cou [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for New York: UCP of Greater Suffolk 250 Marcus Boulevard Hauppauge, NY 11788 Phone: (631) 232-0011 Fax: (631) 232-4422 E-mail: info@ucp-suffolk.org Web: http://www.ucp-suffolk.org 159 Indian Head Road Commack, NY 11725 Phone: (631) 543-4500 Fax: (631) 543-5162 51-33 Terryville Road Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 Phone: (631) 474-5100 Fax: (631) 474-5100 9 Smiths Lane Commack, NY 11725 Phone: (631) 543-2338 Fax: (631) 543-5162 48 Jagger… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
Randy Smith accusing the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable". [read post]