Search for: "Clark v. Floyd" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Kitchin LJ was supported by Floyd LJ and Sir Geoffrey Vos, both of wh [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
It is here - the Supreme Court's decision in Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
Today the court handed down its reasons for those conclusions, the unanimous decision being given by its President, Lord Neuberger, and the other Supreme Court justices, Lords Mance, Clarke, Sumption and Hodge, agreeing with it. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Clark, June 18, 2015, 9-0 on the judgment, two dissenting votes on the main issue and one hard to classify vote. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
 In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:00 am by Charlie Tomlinson, Olswang LLP
Floyd LJ also commented that “[freezing] orders must be construed strictly, so as not to leave any doubt as to what the defendant can and cannot do”. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 9:35 am by Lorene Park
James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis), Mike Doyle (D-Pa), Yvette Clarke (D-NY), and Jared Polis (D-Colo), introduced a CFAA reform bill, H.R. 2454, which essentially adopted the narrow interpretation of the terms “without authorization” and “exceeds authorized access” set forth by the Fourth Circuit in WEC Carolina Energy Solutions, LLC v Miller (July 26, 2012, Floyd, H). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:27 am by Ronald Collins
Clark, Thurgood Marshall: Warrior at the Bar, Rebel on the Bench (1994) Carl T. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 9:54 am by Christina D. Frangiosa
This is the second in a series, discussing the two new Bills proposed in Congress to deal with online pirates and counterfeiters. [read post]
  Lord Clarke repeated a useful quotation of Longmore LJ from Barclays Bank plc v HHY Luxembourg SARL [2010] EWCA Civ 1248: “If a clause is capable of two meanings…it is quite possible that neither meaning will flout common sense. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
 Speaking will be Mr Justice Floyd, Daniel Alexander QC, and Professor Rochelle Dreyfuss on issues relating to the patentability of products and the scope of protection which patents confer on products. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
(77) Malcom Floyd: If V-Jax ends up on a 10 game hold out or being traded to Seattle, Floyd becomes Rivers # 1 WR. [read post]