Search for: "Clark v. Hale"
Results 21 - 40
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
On Tuesday 1 November Lords Hale, Kerr and Wilson will hear Joseph Lennox Holmes v Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
From Monday 7 to Wednesday 9 March 2011, Lords Phillips and Walker, Lady Hale, and Lords Mance and Collins will hear Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:15 am
See Hale v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 7:58 pm
Enon Sand and Gravel, LLC v Clark County Board of Commissioners, 2018 WL 2041696 (SD OH 5/2/2018) [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Tuesday 29 and Wednesday 30 March 2011, Lords Phillips, Walker, Mance, Collins and Clarke will hear NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
The second appeal in the Supreme Court this week is In the matter of Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Limited (in administration) and In the matter of the Insolvency Act 1986 which is to be heard on Wednesday 13 and Thursday 14 July 2011 by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Lord Clarke. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
In this post, Joanna Clark and Emma Ainsley of CMS discuss the judgment handed down by the UK Supreme Court on 15 July 2020 in a referral from the High Court of Justiciary, the Scottish criminal appeal court, in the matter of Sutherland v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2020] UKSC 32 concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained by so-called “paedophile hunter” groups in criminal trials. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
Starting on Monday 21 May 2012 in the Privy Council is the appeal of ANS & anor v ML, listed for two days in front of a panel of five (L Hope, L Hale, L Wilson, L Reed, L Carnwath). [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:05 am
On 5th May, a seven Justice Supreme Court, comprising Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and, reflecting, coincidentally, the changes confirmed earlier this week, Lord Collins (who will shortly retire) and Lord Justice Wilson (who, on this occasion will sit as an acting Justice but who will be sworn in as a full time Justice on 26th May), will consider this issue in the case of R v Waya [2010] EWCA Crim 412. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am
The Supreme Court appeal was heard by a panel of five Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:44 am
Lord Kerr and Lady Hale each gave separate dissenting judgments. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 12:40 pm
Clark v Novacold mostly disapproved. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:34 am
The panel consisted of Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Wilson, Carnwath and Hodge. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, and Lord Clarke on 22 June 2015 and can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:49 am
Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption considered whether the indefinite retention of fingerprints, photographs, DNA samples and DNA profiles of an individual convicted of a recordable offence is an interference with the right to respect for private life protected by ECHR art 8, and if so, whether such interference is justified. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:49 am
Lords Neuberger, Clarke, Wilson, Toulson and Lady Hale will hear the appeal. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
In that judgment (with which both Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson agree) the Court carefully reviews the history of Wilkinson v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
In Courtroom 1, Gale and another v Serious Organised Crime Agency is to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Judge, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 2:39 am
Three judges (Hale, Wilson, Clarke) retain the traditional broad common law view – the position in many Canadian provinces prior to Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17 (available here) – that ongoing suffering in the forum in respect of a tort that happened abroad is sufficient. [read post]
