Search for: "Clements v. Clarke" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2022, 4:44 pm by Howard Bashman
According to the article, “A petition filed by attorney Paul Clement with the high court Thursday asked the court to take the case and find the rule requiring fishermen to pay for the monitors is inconsistent with the Magnuson-Stevens fishing act or to overturn the Supreme Court’s 1984 Chevron v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:46 am by steve cornforth blog
This is demonstrated by the number of lawyers across all parties who have served as MPs – Lloyd George, Herbert Asquith, Clement Atlee, Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, Ken Clarke, Dominc Grieve to name just a few. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases, with help from Clement Clarke Moore. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 3:32 pm by Amy Howe
Reuben Clark Law School, as a “friend of the court” in Collins v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 7:07 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Taco Bell Case Puts Arbitration in Spotlight at Supreme Court (Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson, Bloomberg Law) Supreme Court rejects VW emissions fight (Lesley Clark, E&E News) Americans broadly support Supreme Court upholding Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 6:29 pm
Randall Hodgkinson won in State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:45 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Law firm consultant Cordell Parvin on his Law Consulting Blog Sale of Hancock Tower Completes Distressed Debt Turnaround - Boston attorney Matthew Clark of Dechert on the firm's blog, Crunched Credit Croft v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 11:35 am by Jonathan Shaub
And there is no doubt Meadows, Scavino, Patel, and others, like Trump’s Justice Department ally Jeffrey Clark, are watching carefully what happens with Bannon—who, unlike the other three, was not a government employee during the time at issue. [read post]