Search for: "Clinton v. County of York" Results 1 - 20 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2010, 9:44 am by Marshall Isaacs
” One would think litigators across the state could take solace in the fact that New York State’s Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) provides a framework for lawsuits to play out the same in Richmond County as they do up in Clinton County. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 1:59 pm
CIVIL PROCEDURE, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, PROPERTY LAW & REAL ESTATE, TAX LAW Miner v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am by Ann Tweedy
  As the current Court term churns along and conferences and arguments are conducted and orders are issued, one case from last term--Madison County v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:51 am
Employment-at-will status may be tempered by provisions in the employer’s policy manual or personnel handbook under certain conditionsPearce v Clinton Community College, 246 A.D.2d 775New York State is an “employment-at-will” state. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:24 am by Daniel E. Cummins
There are now at least 10 counties that have ruled in favor of consolidation (Beaver, Cambria, Clinton, Dauphin, Erie, Lawrence, Lehigh, Luzerne, Montgomery, Northampton, and Pike Counties)There are at least 8 counties that have ruled in favor of severance (Adams, Butler, Delaware, Lancaster, Mercer, Schuylkill, Washington, and York Counties).Several counties, including Lackawanna, Montgomery, Philadelphia, and arguably Allegheny have a… [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:44 am by Steve Vladeck
But the Supreme Court rejected those concerns, at least as a categorical matter, in Clinton v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for New York: UCP of Greater Suffolk 250 Marcus Boulevard Hauppauge, NY 11788 Phone: (631) 232-0011 Fax: (631) 232-4422 E-mail: info@ucp-suffolk.org Web: http://www.ucp-suffolk.org 159 Indian Head Road Commack, NY 11725 Phone: (631) 543-4500 Fax: (631) 543-5162 51-33 Terryville Road Port Jefferson Station, NY 11776 Phone: (631) 474-5100 Fax: (631) 474-5100 9 Smiths Lane Commack, NY 11725 Phone: (631) 543-2338 Fax: (631) 543-5162 48 Jagger… [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:59 am
Right to a disciplinary hearing survives the individual’s retirement from the position Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U), Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 0100105/2008, Judge: Marcy S. [read post]
12 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An appointing authority’s failing to make a timely designation of an individual to serve in lieu of the appointing authority in a §75 disciplinary action is a fatal omissionBruso v County of Clinton, 2016 NY Slip Op 03576, Appellate Division, Third Department [Bruso I]Bruso v Clinton County, 2016 NY Slip Op 03577, Appellate Division, Third Department [Bruso II]Bruso IZetra Bruso was employed by the County of Clinton… [read post]