Search for: "Clinton v. Goldsmith" Results 41 - 60 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2007, 12:22 pm
And, of course, we all know what happened in Clinton v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Steve Vladeck
Writing for the 3-2 majority, Judge Stucky relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s 1999 decision in Clinton v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 3:46 pm
As the Supremes noted in Clinton v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 pm
" Opp at 5.The opposition has a discussion of Clinton v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:49 pm by Helen Klein Murillo
Steve Vladeck and Benjamin Wittes argued that important caveats to the Nixon v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 7:48 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
In response to Goldsmith, Benjamin Wittes argued first that Goldsmith’s argument would lead to an absurd conclusion: If the clear statement rule applied to the perjury statute, which also doesn’t by its terms apply to the president, the president could lie to a grand jury, which would have “come as a surprise to Bill Clinton. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 2:18 pm
In one prominent pre-Clinton v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 pm
Shah sought to swat that argument with Clinton v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan Shaub
(The first was by President Clinton.) [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
According to Goldsmith, the legal reasoning was so transparently inadequate that a complete re-writing of the OLA Opinion defining the "torture options" available to executive branch was undertaken. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am by Staley Smith
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 5:46 am by William Ford
Earlier this week, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]