Search for: "Cohen v. Davis"
Results 41 - 60
of 327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Cohen, James D. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Such hearing shall only be held if:(i) the person is related to the child as described under paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of subdivision three of section four hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law;(ii) the child has been temporarily removed under this part, or placed pursuant to section one thousand fifty-five of this article, and placed in non-relative foster care;(iii) the relative indicates a willingness to become the foster parent for such child and has not refused previously to be… [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:27 am
Posted by Greg Andres, Robert Cohen and Paul Nathanson, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Thursday, November 21, 2019 Editor's Note: Greg Andres, Robert Cohen, and Paul Nathanson are partners at Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am
In [*2]addition, a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, in itself, does not give rise to a private cause of action against an attorney or law firm (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513; DeStaso v Condon Resnick, LLP, 90 AD3d 809, 814; Kallman v Krupnick, 67 AD3d 1093, 1096; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254, 254). [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:23 am
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 11 [1st Dept 2008]). [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Rucho v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Davis, 537 A.2d 1100, 1119 (D.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
The limitations period, however, may be tolled where there is a continuing attorney-client relationship pertaining specifically to the matter in which the attorney committed the alleged malpractice (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168 [2001 ]), and where there was “a mutual understanding of need for further services in connection with that same subject matter” (Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 486 [1st Dept… [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
The limitations period, however, may be tolled where there is a continuing attorney-client relationship pertaining specifically to the matter in which the attorney committed the alleged malpractice (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168 [2001 ]), and where there was “a mutual understanding of need for further services in connection with that same subject matter” (Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 486 [1st Dept… [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
So too, in Flowers v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
June 2019 might become known in Illinois as the month the state legalized marijuana use, but I hope it remains better remembered as the 100th anniversary of Illinois’ ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment—the provision in the Constitution that prohibited discrimination in voting on account of sex. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
At the Brennan Center, Andrew Cohen writes that the Supreme Court’s decision last week in Flowers v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The first was New York v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Defendant concedes that a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0) does not, without more, support a malpractice claim (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513 [1st Dept 2014] [citations omitted]). [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Hardwick in Lawrence v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 4:16 am
This claim fails because plaintiff’s various successor counsel had ample time and opportunity to make such a motion, and in fact one did (although it was purportedly abandoned) (see Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 487 [1st Dept 2018]).{**168 AD3d at 75} Even assuming AMS was negligent in failing to move for attorneys’ fees, by agreeing as part of the settlement[FN2] to forgo any award of attorneys’ fees except for $20,000, plaintiff… [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Drawing on and quoting from Printz v. [read post]
