Search for: "Colding v. Johnson" Results 41 - 60 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2014, 9:51 am
Johnson & Johnson, which the blog covered here, underscored the fact that anecdotal evidence is not a reliable source of medical causation. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:45 am by Barbara Moreno
., The Cold War: Law, Lawyers, Spies, and Crises (2016). [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 6:12 am
Topics featured in this issue include the following:* Gillian Davies, formerly of the European Patent Office and now a barrister in Hogarth Chambers, summarises significant decisions of the EPO boards of appeal in 2007;* Birgit Clark (Boult Wade Tennant) discusses the German Bundesgerichtshof COOL WATER/ICY COLD decision on the legitimacy or otherwise of allusive product names as a means of comparative advertising for imitative perfumes;* Marianne Schaffner and Sandra Georges (from… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm by Kevin Johnson
Johnson,  Dean of the UC Davis School of Law and Mabie-Apallas Professor of Public Interest Law and Chicana/o Studies. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:28 am by Russ Bensing
Johnson back to the trial court for application of Johnson, without any analysis of whether the offenses are in fact allied… Speaking of allied offenses, the 12th District holds in State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:53 pm by Bexis
Johnson & Johnson (Ortho Evra)     Deposition2008-07-22 Woods v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:37 am by davidharrisauthor
Johnson, which found that the First Amendment protected the burning of the American flag. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:35 am by Will Baude
Johnson, which (Posner thought) obviously could not be justified on originalist grounds. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
  There’s a possibility that this is just a hold for Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:08 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As one footnote, note that the pivotal "research exemption" case of Madey v. [read post]