Search for: "Coleman v. Johnson*" Results 41 - 60 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 3:17 am by Amy Howe
  That oral argument will be followed by oral arguments in Coleman v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Coleman Co., 2000 WL 1131893, at *2 (9th Cir. 2000) (in table at 232 F.3d 894). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:57 am by Matthew Bush
App.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Michigan et al.Reply of petitioner Coleman v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:59 am
 For a federal habeas court reviewing a state court conviction, `the only question under Jackson is whether that finding was so insupportable as to fall below the threshold of bare rationality.' Coleman v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am by John Elwood
One lonely new hold: Coleman v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:31 am by INFORRM
For the respondents: Dr Matthew Collins QC and Sandy Dawson instructed By Leanne Norman and Phillip Beattie of Banki Haddock Fiora and Gail Hambly and Richard Coleman (Fairfax Media). [read post]
19 Jul 2006, 10:17 am
References: MCL 722.27 Holmes v Coleman, Docket No. 268303 (Michigan Court of Appeals, decided July 18, 2006) See also: Johnson v Johnson, Docket No. 258062 (Michigan Court of Appeals, decided March 1, 2005) Earlier Post on Updates in Michigan Law: Military Deployments: How to Avoid the Danger that Deployment, as an Unmarried Custodial Parent, Could Trigger a Change in Circumstances Permitting the Trial Court to Re-visit and Modify an Existing… [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
ELLIOTT, AND KANE RUSSELL, COLEMAN & LOGAN, P.C.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-05-01013-CV, 241 SW3d 689, 12-13-07)08-0084 MCALLEN HOSPITALS, L.P., ET AL. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm by John Elwood
Coleman, Superintendent v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 8:03 am by Eugene Volokh
From a Reply brief filed by plaintiff's counsel in Wojcik v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am by Jeff Gamso
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]