Search for: "Collins v. United States of America" Results 81 - 100 of 155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2017, 11:41 am by Lyle Denniston
  And, on Thursday, the Justices agreed to create another chapter, agreeing to rule in their new term on a case named Collins v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
3 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Dateline: April 30, 2017, Washington, elsewhere in the multiverseThe election of America’s first woman president brought with it an unimaginable amount of chaos and strife. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Collins, who represents Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire, had claimed three MPs knew about child exploitation in the town but did nothing to intervene. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:26 am by Lori Ringhand and Paul Collins
Transcripts of the hearings fill three volumes of The Supreme Court of the United States: Hearings and Reports on Successful and Unsuccessful Nominations of Supreme Court Justices by the Senate Judiciary Committee, 1916-1975 compilation. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Patterson helped Warren appreciate the evils of America’s racial stratification system. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
  National / International News <> House Hearing On "Waters of the United States" Proposal - The House Agriculture Committee, Subcommittee on Conservation and Forestry held a hearing on the EPA-Corps of Engineers propoal defining "Waters of the United States" or WOTUS. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
We focus first on the landmark 1813 case Queen v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:40 am by SHG
But just as ideas aren’t subject to the approval of self-appointed censors like Danielle Citron, they similarly aren’t any business of the United States of America, no matter who is in office or how artfully they pander to the public to justify the eradication of words and ideas that hurt your feelings or give you a headache. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 3:32 pm by Frank Pasquale
Collins offers another compelling historical analogy: [T]he First Amendment victory in [New York Times v.] [read post]