Search for: "Columbia Aircraft Company v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2011, 6:02 pm
Based on a statement of interest filed by the State Department with the court, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the matter of La Reunion Aerienne v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:18 pm by Barbara Lichman
First chronologically, the City of Los Angeles, owner and operator of Los Angeles International Airport (“LAX”), brought suit in December 2019, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, challenging a southerly shift in flight tracks of departing aircraft from Bob Hope (Hollywood-Burbank) Airport, City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
Other companies of note include the Aviation Industry Corporation of China, a state-owned enterprise (SOE) that is apparently the “sole supplier of military aircraft to the PLA”; and the China Communications Construction Company, an SOE that has been identified as being involved in the creation of the artificial islands in the South China Sea used by the Chinese military. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:49 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
The named defendants are Carson Helicopters, General Electric, Columbia Helicopters, Sirkorsky Aircraft and United Technologies. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Anastasia Bradatan
Therefore, Gul asserted that the United States had lost the authority to detain him at all. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:01 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
Weber Aircraft Corp., 465 U.S. 792, 802 (1984); Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 6:12 am by Kevin
 In the United States, there were numerous bills introduced in Congress that would regulate the collection or use of location information (see e.g,. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
He cited the Geneva Conventions and DoD rules which state that “‘persons parachuting from aircraft in distress’ are considered hors de combat” and cannot be intentionally fired upon. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:36 am by Mike Scarcella
The attorneys, including Cleary partner Juan Morillo, said in the court papers that Nguema, the son of the country’s president, legally acquired the Gulfstream G-V aircraft that the federal prosecutors wants to seize. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:38 am by Saraphin Dhanani
Domestically, in the United States, calls to designate Russia as a State Sponsor of Terrorism (SST) have intensified; they’ve been echoed by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, too. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court case Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]