Search for: "Com. v. E.G."
Results 41 - 60
of 389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2019, 10:35 am
Booking.com B.V. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:38 pm
One movement produced increasingly complex regulatory systems within global production chains (see. e.g. here and here). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:17 am
The Court, therefore, rejected the argument on the addition of ".com" making a mark generic.The Court finally noted that, even though the mark does describe the activity of booking something via a website (specifically hotels), it doesn't prevent others from using the mark in a different context, e.g. booking a car rental or travel tickets.The case does provide further discussion of an important facet of trademark law in the US, which isn't often touched upon by… [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:17 am
The Court, therefore, rejected the argument on the addition of ".com" making a mark generic.The Court finally noted that, even though the mark does describe the activity of booking something via a website (specifically hotels), it doesn't prevent others from using the mark in a different context, e.g. booking a car rental or travel tickets.The case does provide further discussion of an important facet of trademark law in the US, which isn't often touched upon by… [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 3:33 am
” That case, State v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 4:55 am
(See, e.g. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:19 am
By Eric Goldman FragranceNet.com, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:04 am
” Jazz Photo Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
(See,e.g., Rosenthal v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
COM, supra. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:09 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am
See, e.g., Narell v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:56 pm
Whether Adding “.com” to a Generic Mark Creates a Protectable Trademark In USPTO v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:32 pm
See, e.g. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 4:12 pm
See, e.g., Dyna-Med, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
Although subject to exceptions and variations, see, e.g., Hughes v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm
Com. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:16 am
Com. de Equip. [read post]
