Search for: "Com. v. Gamble" Results 21 - 32 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976)................. 30Evans v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:49 am
That second school of thought is winning out. [28] In spite of Russia's seemingly strong commitment to protecting intellectual property rights, a Russian court has acquitted the former head of music download website www.allofmp3.com of violating intellectual property laws. [29]The site, which offered song downloads for as little as 20 cents, drew international attention after it was declared a stumbling block in Russian WTO accession talks with the    For… [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:23 am by Simon Lester
[iv]  Mitigation measures that focus on minimizing the impact by maximizing surge capacity may be seen from a declaration of a domestic “public health emergency”[v] or “a state of emergency. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]