Search for: "Com. v. Held, J." Results 1 - 20 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A Generic Word Combined With “.Com” Can Create A Protectable Trademark
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am by Felicia Boyd (US)
V. [read post]
The Brand Protection Blog - http://www.thebrandprotectionblog.com/
A Generic Word Combined With “.Com” Can Create A Protectable Trademark
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am by Felicia Boyd (US)
V. [read post]
The Brand Protection Blog - http://www.thebrandprotectionblog.com
When is a Generic Word + “.Com” Not Generic? When the Public Doesn’t Think So.
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Laura J. Winston
by Laura J. [read post]
IPso Jure - http://www.ipsojure.co.uk
J&J loses at CAFC for lack of written description
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(J&J), Cordis Corp. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
When is a Generic Word + “.Com” Not Generic? When the Public Doesn’t Think So.
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Laura J. Winston
by Laura J. [read post]
IPso Jure - http://www.ipsojure.co.uk
Bookings.com: Supreme Court Rejects Bright-Line Rule on Generic Terms
9 Jul 2020, 7:01 am by Lauren Rucinski
V.,[1] SCOTUS held that a mark styled as “generic.com” is eligible for federal trademark registration if the applicant shows  “generic.com” is not a generic name to consumers. [read post]
Louisiana Law Blog - http://www.louisianalawblog.com/
Attempted Reverse Domain Highjacking Not Actionable
3 Mar 2009, 3:07 am
Frayne v. [read post]
Chicago IP Litigation Blog - http://www.chicagoiplitigation.com/
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Forth Circuit, BOOKING.COM B.V. v. USPTO, Docket No. 17-2458 and 17-2459, Published Opinion
19 May 2019, 1:05 pm
See 2 J. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
U.S. Supreme Court, Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B.V., Docket No. 19-46, J. Ginsburg
16 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm
Booking.com B.V., Docket No. 19-46, J. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Kokesh v. SEC, Docket 16-529
21 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
SEC, Docket 16-529, J. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Copyright Law - First Circuit - Can You Prove You Own That Song?
11 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Ray Dowd
., Inc. v. [read post]
Copyright Litigation Blog - http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/
Chicago 2016 is a Trademark, But Not All City-Plus-Olympic-Year Marks Are
28 Oct 2009, 4:13 am
Frayne v. [read post]
Chicago IP Litigation Blog - http://www.chicagoiplitigation.com/
Texas employers will welcome the decision in Marsh USA Inc. v. Cook
3 Aug 2011, 2:10 pm by Liskow & Lewis
& Com. [read post]
The Energy Law Blog - http://www.theenergylawblog.com/
Predicting the Outcome in Harvey v. Sybase Based on California Supreme Court Precedent
11 Aug 2008, 12:05 pm
Justice Roger J. [read post]
California Punitive Damages - http://calpunitives.blogspot.com/
South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., Docket No. 17-494
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
” Com­plete Auto, 430 U. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Case Law, Canada: Haaretz.com v Goldhar: Supreme Court rules on jurisdiction and forum in multi-jurisdictional Internet defamation claims – Natasha Holcroft-Emmess
9 Jul 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Côté J et al. held that the motion judge had fallen into error in his forum conveniens analysis [50]. [read post]
Inforrm\'s Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/
Supreme Court holds that ordinary claims accrual rules, including the delayed discovery doctrine, apply to UCL claims: Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.
25 Jan 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
J. [read post]
The UCL Practitioner - http://www.uclpractitioner.com/
New Case Involving Attorney Work Product: Coito v. Superior Court
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by NFS Esq.
Dennis J. [read post]
Noah F. Schwinghamer Blog - http://www.nfsesq.com/blog/
Commonwealth Court Rules, In Case First Impression, That a Private Sector Defendant Can Rely Upon Venue Statutory Argument Typically Reserved to PENNDOT
22 Feb 2022, 1:25 pm
In the case of first impression of Kim v. [read post]
Tort Talk - http://www.torttalk.com/
ICPC Does Not Require a Home Study for a Noncustodial Parent Who Is Not the Subject of Allegations or Findings of Abuse or Neglect – Published Opinion from Supreme Court of Ky.
29 Mar 2021, 7:19 am by Elizabeth Howell
A.G. v. [read post]
Divorce Law Journal - https://www.louisvilledivorce.com/blog/