Search for: "Com. v. Hughes, J."
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm
Cir. 2003) (Lourie, J., dissenting from denial of petition for rehearing en banc). [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
Although subject to exceptions and variations, see, e.g., Hughes v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
From our much-admired former guest Kat and respected blogger Norman Siebrasse comes news that the IPKat has been judicially cited by Hughes J of the Federal Court of Canada in Pfizer Canada Inc v Pharmascience Inc 2013 FC 120 at paragraph 75, for the Kat's explanation of the "Angora cat" approach to claim construction (the cited url is not exactly right -- it says "com-uk" rather than "co.uk"). [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:00 pm
L.J. 639 *** Hugh M. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
J. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
In Metropolitan International Schools v Designtechnica [2009] EWHC 1765 (QB) at [35] Eady J commented that it was “surprising how little authority there is within this jurisdiction applying the common law of publication or its modern statutory refinements to internet communications”, and the same is the case in Australia[5]. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 11:59 pm
Bartholomew Verdirame, Tony V. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
I have linked each president's first name to its dot-com equivalent website. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
I have linked each president's first name to its dot-com equivalent website. [read post]
