Search for: "Com. v. Johnson, T."
Results 21 - 40
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2009, 3:42 am
(Not would have; Johnson was indigent, and it’s arguable that the judge couldn’t have imposed a fine if he’d wanted to.) [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:41 am
Last week’s decision by the 8th District in State v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:49 am
One decision I didn’t cover was AT&T v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:56 am
” An ineffective assistance claim also showed up, but wasn’t ruled upon, in State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:33 am
Johnson, which overruled State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Plus, I don’t have anything else to write about, so today I’m going to crib from Stu and highlight US v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:21 am
"Ed Johnson, the long-time Oregon Law Center lawyer in the Portland case, was also the plaintiffs’ lawyer in the recent Grants Pass case that extended the rule adopted by the Ninth Circuit in the notorious decision Martin v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:47 am
In State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:32 am
Johnson is the subject of a thoughtful concurring opinion in State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 6:55 am
But I sure hope this isn't the start of another drawn-out season of mindless destruction. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:45 am
They did in State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am
Johnson & Johnson, Inc., 679 F. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:31 am
Johnson, robbery and theft merge. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am
You don’t need to await the opinions of the courts of appeals; they’re right here… In State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 3:50 am
The result in State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:58 pm
Johnson & Johnson, 647 F.3d 1353, 1366 (Fed. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:41 am
First up is State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
The superiority of Johnson‘s simpler approach is displayed by the 12th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
