Search for: "Comm. v. Small (Majority Opinion)" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Court’s Myopia The plurality opinion in McCutcheon, like the majority opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:23 pm by Tom Fisher
On May 26, 2010, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in Deere & Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
Township of Scott, concluding that a plaintiff alleging that local governments have violated the Takings Clause under the Fifth Amendment may seek relief directly in federal court, as a constitutional violation occurs at the time of the taking without payment, even if just compensation is subsequently paid.[1] In the 5-4 majority opinion, the Court overruled, in part, Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 8:39 am
But the guy definitely likes what he likes, and he structures his life around those preferences.The majority opinion affirms the ALJ's finding that Turner's able to work, but Judge Gould dissents, in part based on Turner's lifestyle. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:17 pm by NBlack
The majority wisely explained: “The better analogy to this case is Board of Airport Comm’rs of Los Angeles v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Comm’n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) (quoting Welch v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
" But the majority opinion affirms summary judgment based on a "hot dispute"—the applicable statute of limitations, which is a legal question to be decided by the court.And the majority opinion incorrectly holds that, as matter of law, FDCPA claims must fail when "only a small portion of the debt [sought to be collected] may have been time-barred. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
On page 10, the majority decision claims that the whistleblower protection, “is a relatively small part” of SOX. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am by Adam Feldman
Sotomayor authored only one majority opinion when precedent was reviewed but went unaltered. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:48 pm by David Kopel
Comm’r of Revenue (U.S. 1983) (special tax on newspaper ink violates First Amendment). [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Expanding the size of the Court could accomplish similar results and, at the same time, enable the Court to increase the number of disputes to be heard on its record-small docket. [read post]