Search for: "Commissioner of Labor v. Cole" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2007, 3:16 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094, the Third District Court of Appeal has invalidated the Labor Commissioner's designation of Hartwig v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:14 am
My colleague, Jessica Grant, kindly wrote the following summary of the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Murphy v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
For wage and hour attorneys, Wednesday's hearing in Murphy v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Distinguishing between employees and independent contractorsYoga Vida NYC (Commissioner of Labor), 2016 NY Slip Op 06940, Court of AppealsOn October 25, 2016 this LawBlog posted summaries of two decisions by the Appellate Division, Third Department: Cole (Niagara Falls Housing Authority--Commissioner of Labor), 2016 NY Slip Op 06281 and Devore v DiNapoli, 2016 NY Slip Op 06934, both addressing whether an individual was an employee or an… [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 11:46 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., which addressed two issues: "first, whether the 'one additional hour of pay' provided for in Labor Code section 226.7 constitutes a wage or premium pay subject to a three-year statute of limitations . . . or a penalty subject to a one-year statute of limitations . . .; second, whether a trial court, conducting a de novo trial, can consider additional wage claims not presented in the administrative proceeding before the state… [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:10 am
The Commissioner argued that Reynolds is distinguishable because the judicial proceedings were initiated by employees under Labor Code § 1194, whereas here, the Commissioner filed suit on the employees' behalf pursuant to Labor Code § 1193.6. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:17 pm
  In June 2005, the California Labor Commissioner designated  as a precedent decision the finding in Hartwig v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm by nedaj
CA RIAs to pooled investment vehicles may avoid the independent party and surprise examinations requirements by having audited financial statements prepared by an independent public accountant registered with the PCAOB and distributing such audited financial statements to all limited partners (or members or other beneficial owners) of the pooled investment vehicle, and to the Commissioner of the California Department of Business Oversight (“DBO”). [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
For this reason, among others, the Gentry court determined that individual wage and hour hearings before the Labor Commissioner (Berman hearings) "are neither effective nor practical substitutes for class action [proceedings]. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Determining the existence of an employer-employee relationship Cole (Niagara Falls Hous. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am by CFM Admin
CA RIAs to pooled investment vehicles may avoid the independent party and surprise examinations requirements by having audited financial statements prepared by an independent public accountant registered with the PCAOB and distributing such audited financial statements to all limited partners (or members or other beneficial owners) of the pooled investment vehicle, and to the Commissioner of the California Department of Business Oversight (“DBO”). [read post]