Search for: "Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives v. McGahn" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am by Michael Stern
Most notably, it lacked any legal staff to represent it in court. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second period represents a time of flux for privilege as the executive branch wrestles with the fallout from Watergate and attempts to interpret and apply United States v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:47 am by William Ford
Bipartisan bills in the House and Senate seek to reclaim Congress’s role in determining when the United States uses force abroad. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
  THE MODERN ALTERNATIVE The House of Representatives recently asked the Justice Department to prosecute Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino for the statutory crime of contempt of Congress. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
Circuit’s 2020 en banc decision in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
But none had a higher profile than her decision in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
They implicate fundamental questions about the role of courts in the United States’s constitutional structure. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:01 am by William Ford
United States, the Supreme Court explained that an act is “legislative” if it is “an integral part of the deliberative and communicative processes by which Members participate in committee and House proceedings with respect to the consideration and passage or rejection of proposed legislation or with respect to other matters which the Constitution places within the jurisdiction of either House. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 7:53 am by Elliot Setzer
Circuit’s ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Late last week, in Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]