Search for: "Commonwealth v. Baker, E." Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2020, 1:16 am by INFORRM
This month in the Courts Viers v Baker, in the Supreme Court of Virginia, an action for the intentional infliction of emotional distress and defamation in relation to the firing of an administrative assistant at the Commonwealth’s Attorney Office. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 7:36 pm by Linda McClain
Pérez-Giménez, a federal district court judge in the District of Puerto Rico, made headlines by granting the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico’s motion to dismiss in Conde-Vidal v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker recently cited the Health Connector and its challenges in enrolling Massachusetts residents in health insurance plans as part of the Affordable Care Act that forced the state to temporarily transition hundreds of thousands of state residents into the commonwealth’s Medicaid program as a primary reason for the state’s projected $1.5 billion budget deficit. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:00 pm by Kevin
#K, Santa Ana James Michael Desmond, 35, A B Auto Body, 1607 E. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am by Daniel E. Cummins
")In The Driver's SeatPost-Koken decision making dominated the field of auto insurance law in 2009By Daniel E. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
On 25 March 2019, the Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal in the case of Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism On 27 March 2019, the Court of Appeal refused permission to appeal in the case of Monir v Wood. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
The language used by the New York Court of Appeals is representative:[W]e must, most importantly, determine the consistency of [negligence per se] with the purposes underlying the legislative scheme. [read post]