Search for: "Commonwealth v. Cooper" Results 121 - 140 of 270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm by Mitchell Silverman
§ 7, enacted in 1996, is unconstitutional; and in another order, Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am by Florence Campbell Jones
”[8] To discuss how this decision may affect your business operations, please contact Anupreet Amole of our London office or your usual Brown Rudnick adviser. ___________ [1] R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] UKSC 2 (https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2018-0215-judgment.pdf) [2] R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am by Ralf Michaels
Senior judges have repeatedly noted the excesses of the Spiliada regime, in terms of the time, expense and judicial resource spent in litigating questions about the appropriate forum (see, most recently, Lord Briggs in Vedanta Resources Plc v Lungowe [2019] UKSC 20, [6]-[14]), yet they and the rule makers have done little or nothing about it. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Rosalind English
The judges reluctantly followed the line taken in R (Corner House Research and another) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm by Scott Burris
The important issue is its vision of coexistence and cooperation in a democratic commonwealth. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:17 am by Chukwuma Okoli
The defendant/appellant was apparently not pleased with the distribution and did not cooperate with the deceased’s family, who tried to gain access to the deceased’s properties. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:37 pm by Nicki Milionis
Mr Hanna made admissions, cooperated with the regulator and assisted the Tsahrelias family. 4. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A contract violating Section 4 78 is illegal “and under our settled rules [New York courts] refuse to aid in it but leave the parties where they are” (Spivak, 16 NY2d at 168, citing McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465 [1960]; see also El Gamayel v Seaman, 72 NY2d 701, 705 [1988] [“As a matter of public policy, a contract to provide services in violation of [Judiciary Law§ 478] is unenforceable in our state… [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 8:18 am by Michael DelSignore
The reason is criminal charges are taken out by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and not taken out by the alleged victim. [read post]