Search for: "Commonwealth v. Frederick, S." Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Department of the Navy, with David S. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 12:21 pm by Ronald Mann
About the only thing clarified by yesterday’s oral argument in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
After the jump the rough draft of this week’s cases, no barn burners.SCOTUS Renico v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 7:45 am by Alfred Brophy
Haverty-Stacke, Trotskyists on Trial: Free Speech and Political Persecution Since the Age of FDR Sanford V. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:13 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  And that’s where things stand at the moment in the case of Partington v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
Factual background As previously reported on UKSC blog (here and here), this case emerged in the aftermath of a successful 2009 judicial review[1] brought by British businessmen Sir David and Sir Frederick Barclay (the “Barclay brothers”) in respect of the Reform (Sark) Law 2008 (the “2008 Law”). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
And while the Navy’s understanding of its own catastrophic neglect of safety in its shipyards came before Selikoff’s publications, the Navy’s coyness kept its information from being widely disseminated. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:41 am by INFORRM
The Ritz is now owned by David and Frederick Barclay, and they are at present locked in what the media are describing as “bitter” legal proceedings (in tabloid-speak, is there any other kind of legal dispute?) [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:14 am by New Books Script
J 301 M323 [V. 2] A breviate of parliamentary papers, 1917-1939 / P. [read post]