Search for: "Commonwealth v. Kennedy, D." Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
Okoli, The fragmentation of (mutual) trust in Commonwealth Africa – a foreign judgments perspective Andrew Moran & Anthony Kennedy, When considering whether to recognise and enforce a foreign money judgment, why should the domestic court accord the foreign court international jurisdiction on the basis that the judgment debtor was domiciled there? [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:53 am by John Elwood
  (The Chief, Stevens, or Kennedy might also have it, but I think they’d be unlikely to take a second opinion if their first opinion is a fairly controversial one that will involve responding to dissents.) [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:38 am
  If you're interested in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:30 am
[d]oes not speak more than casually about his girl friend. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
As noted in a recent decision from New York, Matter of Kennedy v. 3rd Track Constructors , 213 A.D.3d 1005, 182 N.Y.S.3d 803 (3d Dept. 2023) [see § 39.03, n. 23.3], the imposition of disqualification penalties must be proportionate to the unethical conduct. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, J., joined, and in which SCALIA, J., joined except as to Parts III and V–B–1.Note the additional shades of grey added by the Kagan + Alito concurrence and the partial reservation of Scalia's concurrence with Ginsburg and Kennedy.Court watchers will immediately note that this alignment has nothing to do with traditional “liberal” v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
The power authority filed suit in Puerto Rico commonwealth court, Vitol removed the suit to federal court, and the power authority won a remand to commonwealth court based on a forum-selection clause. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
States in the latter category must be careful of attempting to stretch their statute's similarity to defamation law too far, as the Commonwealth of Massachusetts did in [Commonwealth v. [read post]