Search for: "Commonwealth v. Marshall" Results 41 - 60 of 109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
  In Puerto Rico v. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
From The Dallas Morning News, there's a review of Will Haywood's Showdown: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court Nomination That Changed America (Knopf).The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Zach Benoit (2L), Malini Dhanraj (2L), Sam Nath (3L) The competition involved a case of Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Chief Justice Margaret Marshall wrote: The question before us is whether, consistent with the Massachusetts Constitution, the Commonwealth may deny the protections, benefits and obligations conferred by civil marriage to two individuals of the same sex who wish to marry. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:01 pm by Patricia Salkin
Marshall v City of Philadelphia, 2014 WL 3579694 (PA 7/21/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/pa-supreme-court/1673382.html Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has requested the circulation of the following essay, entitled "Promulgating Ordinances – Public Scrutiny and Judicial Review. [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:00 am
 The opinion cites to John Marshall's closing argument in Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 6:46 am by The Charge
  However, Bailey - and specifically Justice Scalia's concurrence - calls the SJC's ruling in Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
Also, in 2011 the post-statute medical malpractice case of Marshall v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:10 pm by The Charge
  Reaffirming the rebuttable presumption of propriety for peremptory challenges, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:24 am by The Charge
  Putting aside that neither of those requirements was met in Commonwealth v. [read post]