Search for: "Compton v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
But I had studied only one of Justice Compton's opinions in detail before (City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 11:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Of the standing issue in Personal Audio (Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:44 am by Kali Borkoski
 The Court has also invited the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Compton School District v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
"Navigable waters" are defined as "the waters of the United States, including the territorial seas. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia explains, under the laws of evidence in effect in the United States, a presumption of a particular fact can be made without the aid of proof in some situations. . . . [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
United States, 581 F.2d 390, 397 (4th Cir. 1978). [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See, e.g., United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 12:35 pm by Amanda Pickens Nitto
July 11, 2018) (purported collective and class action removed from state to federal court alleging defendant manipulated time records of sales and account managers and failed to pay employees overtime) Compton v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 2nd February, the UKSC will hand down judgment in R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited). [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:36 am by Jeff Welty
It’s uncharted territory, but I seriously doubt that pervasive and persistent surveillance of that nature comports with the Fourth Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]