Search for: "Comptroller v. Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2024, 3:20 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Michael Tappin KC) Merck Serono SA v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] EWHC 3240 (Ch) (19 Dec 2023)This was an appeal by Merck Serono SA ("Merck") against Mary Taylor's refusal to grant a supplementary protection certificate ("SPC") in respect of cladribine (see Merck Serono S.A. v Comptroller 26 May 2023 BL O/ [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” [See, also, Matter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm'rs, Local 1 v New York City Dept. of Educ., 87 AD3d 883, an entity not a party to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may not be bound by its terms.]* See Governor’s Program Bill Mem, Bill Jacket, Chapter 504 of the Laws of, 2009 ** Civil Service Law § 209-a [1] [e]*** Matter of City of Oswego, 21 NY3d 880; Matter of City of Yonkers v Yonkers Fire… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
Retirement benefits based on only an employee’s regular salary and termination pay or other compensation paid in anticipation of retirement excludedDavies v NYS LPFRS, 259 AD2d 912, motion for leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 810A Taylor Law contract negotiated by the City of Corning and its police officers allowed unit members to elect to participate in a “senior officer” program. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Steve Vladeck covered the decision for this blog; other coverage comes from Taylor Brailey of JURIST. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:23 pm
It may not be Alice v CLS Bank International all over again, but Lantana Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents, Design and Trade Marks [2014] EWCA Civ 1463,  a Court of Appeal for England and Wales from 13 November, shows that when it comes to disqualifying computer software from patentability [or patent eligibility, as the Americans prefer to call it] on the basis that it doesn't disclose an invention, the Brits can do the job at least as elegantly as… [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Limitations on the use of sick leave by police officers Economico v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
The case is C‑364/13, International Stem Cell Corporation v Comptroller General of Patents, and it comes from a reference from the Patents Court, England and Wales. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The First Amendment prohibits a State’s collecting an agency shop fee from an individual on behalf of an employee organization that the individual does not wish to join or supportHarris v Quinn, USSC #11-681, decided June 30, 2014The U.S. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:04 am
 * Lantana's lament: no technical contribution, no patent Jeremy gives the floor to Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP), who recounts the tale of Lantana Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents, Design and Trade Marks [2014] EWCA Civ 1463, a Court of Appeal for England and Wales decision which further explored the oldie-but-goldie issue of software patentability, this time considering a data transfer method.BREAKING 'GOLDEN BALLS' NEWS:… [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
To use a credit card please go to the BookLocker at:http://www.booklocker.com/books/3916.html[]===========General Index of Topics Ability to perform light duty - discontinuation of GML §207-c benefitsAdministrative proceduresAge discriminationAgreement to retire.Allowing the arbitrator to exceed authorityApplicants for §207-c benefits -a "direct causal relationshipApplication for an accident disability retirement - tie vote by review boardApplications for accidental… [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
Talking of Mr Justice Arnold, that very same judge drew the Kats' attention to a recent Patents Court for England and Wales decision of Mr Justice Floyd in Daiichi Sankyo v Comptroller of Patents in which Novartis was not allowed to join this case as a party in order to participate in its reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In contrast, employees in a collective bargaining unit within the meaning of the Taylor Law,[13]regardless of their holding “permanent appointment” or otherwise, are typically entitled to many, if not all, the rights and benefits established through collective bargaining and set out in a collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Indian Patent Office decisions now searchable and downloadable: (Indian Patent Oppositions), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (Spicy IP), Institute for Progress study on inter partes re-examination: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IAM), (Hal Wegner) Nintendo loses patent suit over 3D controller; Anascape awarded $21M in damages: motion for… [read post]