Search for: "Concerned Citizens for Equality v. McDonald"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
The Court held in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
In Meyer v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
" In deciding that the Second Amendment applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, the Court in McDonald v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
Sebelius, the Court seems to be concerned with “the freedom to live like it’s 1804. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
Free speech rights in the Irish Constitution 2.1 The freedom of political expression The right “to express freely … convictions and opinions” contained in Article 40.6.1(i) of the Constitution is now understood, broadly speaking, as a freedom of political expression, concerned with the public activities of citizens in a democratic society (see Murphy v Irish Radio and Television Commission [1999] 1 IR 12, 24, [1998] 2 ILRM 360, 372, (28 May… [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Among other concerns, the redistricting process has been plagued with allegations of partisan gerrymandering — that is, one political party manipulating district lines in order to disproportionately increase its advantage in the upcoming elections, disenfranchising voters of the opposing party (see generally Rucho v Common Cause, 588 US —, 139 S Ct 2484, 2494 [2019]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Among other concerns, the redistricting process has been plagued with allegations of partisan gerrymandering — that is, one political party manipulating district lines in order to disproportionately increase its advantage in the upcoming elections, disenfranchising voters of the opposing party (see generally Rucho v Common Cause, 588 US —, 139 S Ct 2484, 2494 [2019]). [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
Professor Kopel one coauthor a law review article with Professor Moody, and presented an empirical study by Moody in an amicus brief in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am
Before the Supreme Court's Heller (2008) (D.C. cannot ban handguns) and McDonald v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
In NAACP v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
In NAACP v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
Plus principle (ii) is an endorsement of the view (rejected by the Court two years later in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Data collected by innovative organizations has enormous value and is and can be used to vastly improve our country and its citizens’ economic, social, and personal health, among other things. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Data collected by innovative organizations has enormous value and is and can be used to vastly improve our country and its citizens’ economic, social, and personal health, among other things. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
I assume the same would hold true for the court’s ruling in McDonald v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Conspiracy of Hunches: Roger Stone trial set to start this week San Francisco Chronicle – Devlin Barrett, Spencer Hsu, and Manuel Roig-Franzia (Washington Post) | Published: 11/4/2019 Roger Stone is on trial in federal court, where prosecutors plan to dive back into an episode of political chicanery, alleged lies, and conspiratorial texts that parallels the nascent impeachment inquiry into his longtime friend President Trump. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Although marriage is a fundamental right, this is not a case—like Loving or, more recently, Obergefell v. [read post]
