Search for: "Concerned Members v. District Court"
Results 41 - 60
of 6,320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2013, 4:43 am
The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, holding that the challenged statements could not reasonably be understood to be "of and concerning" Gilman. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:03 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted the plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class in a putative class action concerning the sale of mortgage backed securities (MBS) by an investment bank. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:32 pm
On June 23, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Dollar General Corporation v. [read post]
Justices reverse Wisconsin court ruling that increased majority-Black districts in state legislature
23 Mar 2022, 6:34 pm
The ruling in Grothman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:55 pm
On December 7, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inDollar General Corporation v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 2:31 pm
There is currently a dispute concerning which persons are the true members of its board. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:57 am
Nevertheless, the district court judge did not fare well here:The district court’s elision of the claim limitation (supported by the specification) that the shoulder supporting members are either changeable or adjustable is legal error because all the limitations in a claim must be considered meaningful. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
United Healthcare Services, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Aug. 4, 2016), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Two) held that UCL, FAL, and other claims brought on behalf of a putative class of members of a health care plan governed by the federal Medicare Advantage program (a Part C plan) were expressly preempted by the Medicare Act. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Baloco v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
Smith v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:04 am
(NDCal Ombuds; Gazzano v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:15 am
On March 8, 2012, Southern District Court Judge, Jeffrey T. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:22 am
The Davis-Miller Court embraced the Cohen v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in favor of Nintendo in Anascape, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
(I reviewed the district court decision here.) [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
Mondragon v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Further, the Association argued that it "owned the right to go to arbitration" which is the traditional view in such situations.In Hickey v Hempstead Union Free School District, 36 A.D.3d 760, the Appellate Division said that a union member generally has no individual rights under a collective bargaining agreement that he or she can enforce against an employer. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
On February 8, 2010, the Second District, Division Four, issued a modification of its opinion in Steroid Hormone Product Cases (previously discussed here), to include discussion distinguishing its opinion from prior opinions Cohen v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
In the case, the district court issued a preliminary injunction barring the Navy from imposing its COVID vaccine mandate on 35 Navy service members who have religious objections to the vaccines. [read post]
10 May 2022, 10:05 am
Its Board of Trustees consists of nine members, each of whom is elected from a single-member district for a six-year term. [read post]
