Search for: "Condon v. People"
Results 141 - 160
of 419
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 2:41 pm
But people make poor choices and selfish choices at least as often as they make virtuous ones. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
[W]e do not want people to feel undignified when they walk into any place of business and do business that, you know, serves the public. . . . [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
” This conduct included “counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements” and “[a]pproving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:21 pm
In the case of People V. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:21 pm
In the case of People V. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:21 pm
In the case of People V. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:54 am
” Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 5:51 am
Mapp v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:30 am
Sessions also relied upon Judge Diane Sykes’s dissenting opinion in Hively v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:00 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in another case this year, Buck v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
How many people were affected in Ohio’s voter purge? [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 7:18 am
In Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
A leading case denying fees is Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 4:59 am
In Rainy River (Town) v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 11:42 am
Hashem v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
At long last, the en banc 11th Circuit today decided United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:43 am
Mason v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am
In determining whether the tweets had defamatory tendencies that would lower Ms Monroe in the estimation of right-thinking people (i.e. the hypothetical reader of Twitter from all political leanings and who disapproves of those who condone criminality), the Judge held that right-thinking members of society “would regard [spraying graffiti on public monuments] as obnoxious behaviour” and it was immaterial that it was carried out to express a political viewpoint. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Many people talk a good game on law and politics. [read post]
