Search for: "Coney v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2021, 10:06 am by Christiana Wayne
Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the majority. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 8:01 pm by Tom Smith
"After a term in which the court’s conservative majority overturned Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
According to news reports, Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a judge on the Chicago-based U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:12 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Dobbs, State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm by Adam Feldman
Conversely, Barrett authored an opinion coded as “liberal” in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
On Sept. 26, President Trump nominated Judge Amy Coney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg eight days earlier. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 4:56 am by Jonathan H. Adler
[Judge Amy Coney Barrett participated in a moot court of Texas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
And when the law and facts are on your side, you generally prevail, regardless of which the side of the “v” on which you litigate the employment dispute. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 7:11 am by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court in an argued case: Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivered the opinion of the Court in Van Buren v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 6:35 am by Howard Bashman
United States, No. 21-5099, Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a statement, in which Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined, respecting the denial of certiorari. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 4:15 am by Sue Ghosh Stricklett
In what many regard as the intellectual property case of the century, the United States Supreme Court has—on October 7, 2020—presided over oral arguments in Google v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 3:52 pm by Ryan Mulvey
Supreme Court decided United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al. v. [read post]