Search for: "Connolly v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 295
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2024, 1:45 pm
1.SCOTUS will hear Fischer v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:15 pm
From today's decision in Williams v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:41 am
” Huber v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
The court in Pannu v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm
Miss.) in Favre v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am
From Parents Defending Education v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 1:57 pm
– 1:00 pm (Discussion) Boyd School of Law Room 203 In Person Registration is required Click Here To Register For the Student Only In Person Discussion In June, the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Brackeen v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Steinbach, once a litigation partner Williams & Connolly LLP and latterly a teacher of United States History and American Government courses at the Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC, on how United States history can also be taught and understood by focusing on constitutional history (YouTube). [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Joseph's Hospital Health Center v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
In addition, the United States Catholic Conference was allowed to intervene in the case, and their lawyer was a leading church/state litigator for Williams & Connolly, a prominent Washington D.C. law firm. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:28 pm
Lac du Flambeau Band v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
Two separate challenges were before the court on Tuesday, but the justices spent most of their time and energy on the first case, which is known as Biden v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:17 am
From Blankenship v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:21 am
From State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 5:18 pm
Uniloc v. [read post]
