Search for: "Cook v. Ford Motor Company" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am by Yosha Law
” Grimshaw vs Ford marked a change in liability cases In 1978, the Ford Motor Company was found responsible for $127.8 million in damages for the wrongful death of Ford Pinto driver Lily Gray and the personal injuries sustained by her 13-year-old passenger, Richard Grimshaw. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 1:00 am by Yosha Law
” Grimshaw vs Ford marked a change in liability cases In 1978, the Ford Motor Company was found responsible for $127.8 million in damages for the wrongful death of Ford Pinto driver Lily Gray and the personal injuries sustained by her 13-year-old passenger, Richard Grimshaw. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm by Patricia Hughes
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 1:30 am
  In the advertising supplements the Cook Motor Company trumpeted the sporty new Ford Falcon for $1,795. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 4:34 am by Chris Castle
Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757 (1981) and the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (1998).) [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm by Ron Coleman
First approach:  MODEL E is an obvious member, or future member, of the Ford Motor Company “MODEL X” “family of marks. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 7:54 am by Robert Kreisman
  The NTSB claims that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has known about deficiencies in bus company practices before some fatal crashes but took no steps to correct them. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Tex. 2005) (relative risk less than 3.0 represents only a weak association) Cook v. [read post]