Search for: "Cook v. Hart"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
"] From Coffeeshop, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:52 am
Thorton (1996) and Cook v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am
In this case the Court seems to have taken a less stringent approach than it did in previous cases such as Cooke & Midland Hart v MGN [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB), in which it was held that serious harm could only be inferred in the most extreme of circumstances. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
Hepatitis A is a communicable (or contagious) disease that often spreads from person to person.[11] Person-to-person transmission occurs via the “fecal-oral route,” while all other exposure is generally attributable to contaminated food or water.[12] Food-related outbreaks are usually associated with contamination of food during preparation by a HAV-infected food handler.[13] The food handler is generally not ill because the peak time of infectivity—that is, when the most virus is… [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Wojcik described as a major national LGBT national law conference in response to the 10th anniversary of Bowers v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 3:45 am
Don’t lawyers on the same side of the “v” protect each other like cops and doctors do? [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Hopefully BMG v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:30 am
v=DVLVZ-ODYRY. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 5:30 am
v=DVLVZ-ODYRY. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD810 .M63 v. 7Elizabeth Cooke, ed., Modern Studies in Property Law (Oxford: Hart Pub., 2013). [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
Danail V. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:54 am
The Case A bit of background to the Cooke v MGN case. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
Judgment was handed down today by Mr Justice Bean in the libel case of Cooke and Anor v MGN ([2014] EWHC 2831 (QB)). [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:00 am
Evelyn Hart v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
It is for this precise reason that the USDA has repeatedly rejected calls from the meat industry to hold consumers primarily responsible for E. coli O157:H7 infections caused, in part, by mistakes in food-handling or cooking.[34] E. coli O157:H7 infection may lead to severe complications, both acute and chronic. [read post]
