Search for: "Cook v. Rockwell International"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 9:05 am
<> Cook v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm
Defendants, Dow Chemical Company (Dow) and Rockwell International Corporation (Rockwell), timely appealed the judgment, and the class members filed a timely cross-appeal. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
Rockwell International Corp. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
Merilyn Cook, et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:57 am
See Cook v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm
Justice Freeman asked why the Court shouldn't follow Rockwell International Corp. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of Constitutional Law ProfessorsAmicus brief of Specialty Wine RetailersAmicus brief of National Taxpayers UnionCVSG Information:Invited: October 3, 2011 Cook v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 10:24 am
See Schwartzwald ¶¶ 25-26 (citing and quoting Supreme Court decisions in Rockwell International v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm
” The decision may have been the Illinois equivalent of Wickard v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 8:01 am
Cook. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
Rockwell International (10-1377); Fein v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm
Rockwell International Corp.Docket: 10-1377Issue(s): (1) Whether state substantive law controls the standard of compensable harm in suits under the Price-Anderson Act, or whether the Act instead imposes a federal standard; and (2) whether, if a federal standard applies, a property owner whose land has been contaminated by radioactive plutonium, resulting in lost property value, must show some “physical injury” to the property beyond the contamination itself in order to… [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
International Profit Associates, Inc., 2007 WL 3120069, at *10 (N.D. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Rockwell International The litigation over radioactive contamination from the Colorado Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant is illustrative of the retrograde tendency in some federal courts. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:57 am
The court of appeals was also persuaded by the fact that the defendant was the same, and indeed many of the facts alleged the same, as in Rockwell International Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Threats to internal validity, such as confounding, in a study may make reliance upon it unreasonable. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:49 pm
Cook Inc., 582 F.3d 1322, 1327 (Fed. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Rockwell International Corp., 755 F. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
Rockwell International, 10-1377, which presents a nearly identical issue. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Perma Research & Development v. [read post]
