Search for: "Cook v. U.s.*"
Results 1 - 20
of 430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
” Cook v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm
The Appeals Court said, "Exercising appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 5:18 pm
District Judge Royce Lamberth’s opinion in State of Alaska and Escopeta Oil Company v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
From United States v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:44 am
Complaint alleges NEPA, MMPA, ESA violations A new lawsuit filed by Chickaloon Native Village, Natural Resources Defense Council, Center for Biological Diversity and the Center for Water Advocacy alleges violations of the Marine Mammal Protection Act, Endangered Species Act and National Environmental Policy Act in connection with the National Marine Fisheries Service’s issuance of an Incidental Harassment Authorization for seismic surveys in Cook Inlet (Chickaloon Native Village… [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:23 pm
Cook, 362 F.3d 1219, 1225 (9th Cir. 2004). [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 2:21 pm
Cook Med. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:38 am
,Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Lawson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
The December 15, 2011 decision in Cook v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 10:45 am
Via the District of New Jersey, please find attached the order dismissing the case in Ward v. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm
Horn and Mumia Abu-Jamal, a/k/a Wesley Cook v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:40 am
USA v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm
Petitioners Alaska Survival, Sierra Club, and Cook Inletkeeper seek review of the Surface Transportation Board's (STB) decision authorizing Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC) to construct about thirty-five miles of new rail line between Port MacKenzie, located in Alaska's Cook Inlet, and the railroad's main line, located near Wasilla, Alaska. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:17 am
In Bodine v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:52 am
Accordingly, the exemption is limited to attorneys' fees paid for representation guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment in a criminal proceeding and does not extend to attorneys' fees paid for other purposes.Barkett then makes short work of the government's argument:The Government argues that the exemption in § 1957(f)(1) has been "nullified" or "vitiated" because, shortly after the provision was enacted, the Supreme Court held in Caplin & Drysdale,… [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
I talked about this when Cook v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
I talked about this when Cook v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 2:53 am
I talked about this when Cook v. [read post]
