Search for: "Coombs v. Coombs"
Results 21 - 40
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2014, 4:04 am
Byrd v Franklin County, 2014 WL 6435679 (NC App. 11/18/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/? [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:04 am
Byrd v Franklin County, 2014 WL 6435679 (NC App. 11/18/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/? [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:04 pm
However in Coombes v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:41 am
" Coombs v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:25 am
Anderson v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:06 am
Coombs v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:25 am
Sisters of the Sacred Heart of Mary Ltd and Others v Kingston upon Thames Borough Council Chancery Division “The introduction by Kingston upon Thames Borough Council of an unmanned code-operated barrier to control entry to Warren Road, a private road that provided access from a public road to the Coombe Estate, would amount to a substantial interference with the statutory rights of the Sisters of the Sacred Heart of Mary Ltd, Holy Cross Sisters Trustees Inc, Rokeby… [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:26 pm
Coombs notes on his website that on 12 January 2012, they filed a deposition request. [read post]
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Coombe, 567 F.Supp. 345; Weaver v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:36 pm
It’s called, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 11:30 pm
Supreme Court decision entitled Murray v. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 11:23 am
In these days of outsourcing and cost-cutting to the bone, many businesses are resorting to what might be called in-house outsourcing. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:23 am
Importantly, the court did not disturb its earlier ruling in the case of Coombes v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:53 am
In 2007, the court had found, in Coombes v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Coombe, 567 F.Supp. 345; Weaver v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:15 am
The ruling found a physician liable for failing to warn his patient about the side effects of the medications and the potential danger of driving while taking them.The Boston Globe reports on the case and a copy of the slip opinion in the decision of Lyn-Ann Coombes, administratix v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
(Coombes v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 2:15 pm
Medina, attempted to argue that the case was similar to Coombes v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:15 am
The Appellate Division sustained her termination without a hearing, finding that Ramos had violated the terms of her disciplinary probation (Ramos v Coombs, App Div, 237 AD2d 713).NYPPL [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
" Typically an individual serving a disciplinary probationary period may be summarily terminated from employment in the event a term or condition of the disciplinary probation is violated as demonstrated by the decision in Ramos v Coombe, 237 AD2d 713, leave to appeal dismissed 89 NY2d 981. [read post]
