Search for: "Coombs v. Coombs"
Results 21 - 40
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 8:41 am
” (Cairns v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:53 am
In 2007, the court had found, in Coombes v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:20 am
In this week’s case (Coombs v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:13 pm
” (Cairns v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:33 pm
DWAYNE MAYO, Appellant, v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Coombe and William C. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:15 pm
Coombe and William C. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:26 pm
Coombs notes on his website that on 12 January 2012, they filed a deposition request. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:06 am
Coombs v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:37 am
Virtual property: Bragg v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 6:45 pm
Miami Mary Coombs (Miami Law) presents “The Rhetoric of Rationing. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:11 am
Coombes and Edited by Zsolt Debrczy. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 2:05 am
Obiter J points out: R v Smurthwaite and Gill 1994 involved “Solicitation to Murder. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:15 am
The Appellate Division sustained her termination without a hearing, finding that Ramos had violated the terms of her disciplinary probation (Ramos v Coombs, App Div, 237 AD2d 713).NYPPL [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:36 pm
It’s called, United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
Mrs Justice Rafferty noted the Croatian cases, and the observation of Cranston J in Coombes v Waltham Forest LBC [2010] EWHC 666 Admin that There is an obvious conflict between the Strasbourg jurisprudence and our own However, following Husband v Solihull MBC [2009] EWHC 3673 (Admin) and Wandsworth LBC v Dixon [2009] EWHC 27 [links to our reports], Qazi was held to be solid precdent that the rule in Monk was compatible with Art 8. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:44 am
Case: Coombs v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:55 pm
Brecht v. [read post]