Search for: "Cooper v Creative Homes of Distinction"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Consumer groups formed home recording rights organization. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
(Property, intangible) TTAB sustains 2(d) and 2(a) opposition, finding USPS Blue Mailbox famous (TTABlog) TTAB affirms FIRSTAIDE generic for bandages and kits(TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Home Depot – Home Depot seeking to stop other ‘Depots’ (Vegas Trademark Attorney) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
But, while the GDPR may not prohibit California from applying for adequacy, the state faces a more significant issue at home: the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
A ceremony, which from the Russian perspective was characterized as the celebration of the absorption by the Russian Federation of the Ukrainian territories now called the Donetsk People's Republic, the Lugansk People's Republic, the Zaporozhye Region and the Kherson Region, took place in of the Grand Kremlin Palace’s St George Hall on September 30, 2022 at 16:00.At the event, the President of the Russian Federation delivered… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IP finance) Patent perishables – The effects on a company’s patent portfolio when it goes bust (IPEG) Canada Supreme Court rejects application to appeal procedural ruling in copyright case over photos showing marijuana plants growing in the plaintiff’s residence: Agnieska Wojtanowska, et al v Daniel Mustard, et al (Excess Copyright) Federal Court sets high standard of evidentiary detail, reaffirms local distinctiveness in trademark… [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
[ Photo by David Ohmer, Creative Commons License. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:52 am
[from Allingham post]Dickens had problems with copyists at home in Britain. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
The FairPlay coalition comprising more than 25 organizations representing hundreds of thousands of members of Canada’s creative community made a reasonable proposal to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), Canada’s telecommunications and broadcast regulator, to address the scourge of online copyright infringement.[1] The proposal, which involves website blocking, was immediately attacked by anti-copyright activist Michael Geist… [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Ownership of creative works/interference with exercise of copyright rights even without preemption. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione Emilia-Romagna… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
Rights to exclude etc. help you live a private life: our own homes, phones, churches, businesses, and other private spaces facilitates economic freedom as well as cooperation, or simply being left alone as we choose. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
AT&T Inc. and Cellular South, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
To a great degree, the commentaries and Professor Ruggie's responses provide a great coming together of these quite distinct perspectives. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
That power to command is distinct from the traditional authority of the Crown to command individuals (an executive or police power). [read post]
