Search for: "Cooper v. Hall et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
We cannot successfully cooperate with the rest of the world in establishing a reign of law unless we are prepared to have that law sometimes operate against what would be our national advantage. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
What the GC et al decision does do is suggest an immediate and positive way forward for substantive data protection at a policy and not just judicial level. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:46 am
Hall dissented. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
In response James Eadie QC states that withdrawal need not be a joint effort but, if it must be, Parliament’s decision to pass the European Union Referendum Act 2015 is sufficient cooperation with the Government. 14.33: James Eadie QC states “The Government has the constitutional responsibility and ability… to make and ratify treaties. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 5:02 am
Al registrarlo, halló un sobre con efectivo. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Page Keeton, et al., Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts §96, at 686 (5th ed. 1984). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
My article, "Transnational Corporations' Outward Expression of Inward Self-Constitution: The Enforcement of Human Rights by Apple, Inc." has just been published and will appear in the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2):805-879 (2013). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) In his 2004 Storrs Lecture, Gunther Teubner asked:how is constitutional theory to respond to the challenge arising form three current major trends—digitization, privatization and globalization—for the inclusion/exclusion problem? [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Palestinian Authority et al. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
BROIN, ET AL., Petitioners, vs. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
The case is Reichle, et al., v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 8:34 am
The bill authorizes funding to train courts and police in assisting immigrant women who cooperate with law enforcement to receive T- and U-Visas. [read post]
