Search for: "Core v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 7,801
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2010, 6:36 pm
  Although the FLSA contains no requirement to provide meal periods, its core protections are largely the same as under state law. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) April 22, 2014 Tweet Tags: racial preferences, Sonia Sotomayor, Supreme CourtSchuette v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am by INFORRM
However, Supreme Court justices Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas filed dissents in the case of Berisha v Lawson in July suggesting that a core precedent behind this difficulty is ripe for reconsideration. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 2:33 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court held that it was irrelevant, in the Essop case, that some older or BME candidates could pass the Core Skills Assessment in question, and it was discriminatory as the proportion who could pass was smaller than the proportion of white or younger candidates. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
But State ownership of patent rightsis not akin to State ownership of water rights, naturaland important concerns of federalism” and rise to thelevel of core sovereign interests. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:21 am by Josh Sturtevant
However, if you boil this scheme down to a core of 'the state records where and when its citizens are coming and going and keeps the data indefinitely' it doesn't seem to this writer at least that it is unreasonable for citizens of The Bay State to have concerns about potential misuse and even outright abuse by officials. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
At Monday's oral argument in Yeager v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 8:07 am by Joy Waltemath
(The state of Texas and nine other states intervened in this challenge, too, arguing that they have the right to regulate the practice of law in their states and to protect confidential attorney-client information.) [read post]