Search for: "Corrected Rehearing Order"
Results 1 - 20
of 584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2007, 7:32 pm
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion for Rehearing ofMotion to Stay filedby Earl Wesley Berry is denied. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:33 pm
Oct.18,2007), Order Denying Motion for Rehearing of Motion to Stay. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:43 am
A party may petition for rehearing or the court may order rehearing on its own motion. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 7:55 am
Circuit developments as a loss for the federal government, which was correct based on available information but absolutely incorrect once the previously unknown grant of the federal government's petition for rehearing en banc became public. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
According to Newman, the Court should have granted the petition, in order to correct the Patent Office position that “the final order of the... [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:33 am
Circuit this past Friday asking it to grant a rehearing en banc of its decision in CFPB v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:05 pm
For more on the case, see this post of mine, this post of David Post’s, and this follow-up post on the panel’s correction/clarification of its order. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
This is a request for a rehearing of a prior decision in which the Court of International Trade held that certain IKEA towel bars are within the scope of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on aluminum extrusions from China. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:52 pm
On October 4, 2016, the Fifth Appellate District Court of Appeal issued a two-page Order entitled “Order Modifying Opinion and Denying Rehearing [Includes Change In Judgment]” in the recently decided consolidated appeals in the Citizens for Ceres v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:58 am
Circuit to the CFPB’s petition for rehearing en banc. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 9:21 am
" Because the order granting a rehearing en banc was not published but the order denying panel rehearing was published, "[a]nother law blogger depicted yesterday's D.C. [read post]
8 May 2007, 2:20 pm
(A corrected version of the order denying rehearing en banc -- which omits the statement that a response was considered because the court did not request any response to the rehearing petition -- can be accessed here.) [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 9:59 pm
Sandoz Inc. earlier this year, regarding the doctrine of equivalents, which the Court corrected yesterday on Amgen's petition for rehearing regarding the panel opinion. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 12:40 am
Without thebenefit of rehearing, or a clarification of the Order, Mr. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:01 am
The order, which appears not to be accompanied by any dissents from denial of rehearing en banc (or concurrences in the denial) is here: A judge of this court sua sponte requested a vote on whether to rehear this case en banc. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 12:01 pm
The headliners from today’s orders lists were the two denials of rehearing in previously argued cases. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 4:00 pm
The petition for rehearing is denied. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Of course, if the petition for rehearing is really a play for time in order to find a political solution to their problem, then M&M may still have reason to push ahead. ? [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 12:51 pm
., Judge Newman in Cuozzo was correct on Congressional intent on claim construction standard ) note the CAFC opinion of 8 July 2015 in the Cuozzo case located at:http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/14-1301.Opinion.7-6-2015.1.PDFNote also text from Reuters:In a 6-5 vote, the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:05 am
The First District Court released its Order on Rehearing today in Delivorias v. [read post]
