Search for: "Cotton v. Doe" Results 21 - 40 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
The category does not include folding knives ("pocket knives"). [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
That still does not negate the negligence — both direct and vicarious liability. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Here's Justice Gorsuch giving voice to that view earlier this year in his concurrence in West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
AUSTIN — The timeline played the starring role during the opening arguments at the jury trial of the United States v Paul Kruse. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
The main residence of Veraton, circa 1907. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:20 pm by News Desk
Supreme Court is not taking the appeal of Edwin Hardeman v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm by Stuart Kaplow
The new law that will be enforced beginning June 21, 2022 has implications for imported cotton and tomatoes and most significantly for solar panels. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 8:30 am by Holly Brezee
The report, entitled “Adjusting to Alice: USPTO patent examination outcomes after Alice Corp. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[33] To support its position that the balancing requirement does not apply to ETSs, OSHA relies on the Supreme Court’s reasoning in the 1981 Cotton Dust ruling.[34] However, while the Court in that case did hold that a cost-benefit analysis is not required with respect to § 6(b)(5) permanent standards, it did not address whether such an analysis is required with respect to § 6(c) ETSs.[35]Notably, in an ETS challenge decided after the Supreme Court’s… [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 4:09 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
The question on which this analysis turns, as decided by the Supreme Court in Harlow v. [read post]