Search for: "Cox v. U. S" Results 21 - 40 of 77
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2021, 8:49 am by Eugene Volokh
I will largely leave to others prescriptions about what is to be done; but I hope my analysis might help us think through such matters. [1] See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Para ello, es imprescindible que la parte demandante establezca mediante prueba los siguientes requisitos: 1) la existencia de una acción u omisión culposa o negligente; 2) la antijuricidad de la misma; 3) la producción de un daño; y 4) la relación causal entre la acción u omisión y el daño(14). [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Data Sharing Agreement – Implications for Canada https://t.co/o1buxqEYr8 2020-03-20 Case Comment: The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd (Formerly General Motors UK Ltd) [2019] U… https://t.co/ZRhYylEfXU 2020-03-20 Former Googler Anthony Levandowski ‘fesses up to pinching trade secrets about self-driving cars https://t.co/NjKGnYl5cN 2020-03-20 Online credit agreement not enforced summarily Card v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Data Sharing Agreement – Implications for Canada https://t.co/o1buxqEYr8 2020-03-20 Case Comment: The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd (Formerly General Motors UK Ltd) [2019] U… https://t.co/ZRhYylEfXU 2020-03-20 Former Googler Anthony Levandowski ‘fesses up to pinching trade secrets about self-driving cars https://t.co/NjKGnYl5cN 2020-03-20 Online credit agreement not enforced summarily Card v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Muco v Sadiku  2019 NY Slip Op 50709(U)  Decided on May 9, 2019  Supreme Court, Queens County Butler, J is the story of the two purchasers suing each other and every one else too. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Welcome
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (COX, J.) [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:28 am by Mandy Perry
 In a recent High Court case (Cox v Spencer [2017] EWHC 2552 (QB)), the employer was granted an order that meant it could image the employee’s computer to see if it contained any of their confidential information. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
In Cement Masons Local 780 Pension Fund v Schleifer, 56 Misc 3d 1204 [A], 2017 NY Slip Op 50875 [U] [Sup Ct NY County June 29, 2017], Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla considered these issues in a thoughtful opinion, in which she relied on some relatively infrequently litigated provisions of the Business Corporation Law (“BCL”). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am by Peter Margulies
” As the Court has said repeatedly, most recently in 2015’s King v. [read post]